Batch Processing Strategy & API Selection
CoreDesign efficient batch processing strategies · Difficulty 3/5
The Message Batches API allows sending multiple requests as a batch for asynchronous processing at a 50% cost discount, but requires careful workflow matching.
Key Characteristics
Workflow Matching
| Workflow | API | Rationale |
|---|
|----------|-----|----------|
| Pre-merge checks | Synchronous | Blocking, needs immediate results |
|---|---|---|
| Nightly test generation | Batch | Tolerates 24h latency, saves 50% |
| Weekly security audits | Batch | Scheduled, non-blocking |
| Overnight reports | Batch | Latency-tolerant background processing |
SLA Calculation
When batch results feed into a workflow with SLA requirements, calculate submission frequency accounting for the 24-hour processing window. For example, to guarantee a 30-hour SLA, submit batches in 4-hour windows (30 - 24 = 6 hours buffer, submit every 4 hours for safety).
Anti-Pattern: Premature Optimization
Don't switch everything to batch for cost savings. The cost of delayed pre-merge reviews (blocked developers) exceeds the 50% batch savings.
Key Takeaways
- ✓Batch API saves 50% but has up to 24-hour processing with no latency SLA
- ✓Cannot support multi-turn tool-calling workflows due to async nature
- ✓Match workflow latency requirements to the appropriate API -- not everything should be batched
- ✓Use custom_id to correlate requests with responses and handle partial failures
Glossary Terms
An asynchronous Claude API for processing multiple requests in a batch with 50% cost savings versus synchronous requests. Processing takes up to 24 hours with no guaranteed latency SLA. Does not support iterative tool use, streaming, or prompt caching. Best for scheduled, non-blocking analysis.
A field in the Message Batches API request body that lets you correlate each batch request with its response. Must be unique within a batch. Essential for matching asynchronous results back to originating requests when processing thousands of items.
Related Concepts
Test Yourself1 of 3
The code review component works iteratively: Claude analyzes a changed file, then may request related files (imports, base classes, tests) via tool calling to understand context before providing final feedback. You're evaluating batch processing to reduce API costs. What is the primary technical constraint when considering batch processing for this workflow?