Batch Processing Strategy & API Selection

Core

Design efficient batch processing strategies · Difficulty 3/5

0%
batchcostapilatency

The Message Batches API allows sending multiple requests as a batch for asynchronous processing at a 50% cost discount, but requires careful workflow matching.

Key Characteristics

  • 50% cost savings compared to synchronous API calls
  • Up to 24 hours processing time (no guaranteed latency SLA)
  • Asynchronous: fire-and-forget model with polling for results
  • **custom_id** field for correlating requests with responses
  • No multi-turn tool calling: Cannot execute tools mid-request and return results
  • Workflow Matching

    WorkflowAPIRationale

    |----------|-----|----------|

    Pre-merge checksSynchronousBlocking, needs immediate results
    Nightly test generationBatchTolerates 24h latency, saves 50%
    Weekly security auditsBatchScheduled, non-blocking
    Overnight reportsBatchLatency-tolerant background processing

    SLA Calculation

    When batch results feed into a workflow with SLA requirements, calculate submission frequency accounting for the 24-hour processing window. For example, to guarantee a 30-hour SLA, submit batches in 4-hour windows (30 - 24 = 6 hours buffer, submit every 4 hours for safety).

    Anti-Pattern: Premature Optimization

    Don't switch everything to batch for cost savings. The cost of delayed pre-merge reviews (blocked developers) exceeds the 50% batch savings.

    Key Takeaways

    • Batch API saves 50% but has up to 24-hour processing with no latency SLA
    • Cannot support multi-turn tool-calling workflows due to async nature
    • Match workflow latency requirements to the appropriate API -- not everything should be batched
    • Use custom_id to correlate requests with responses and handle partial failures

    Test Yourself1 of 3

    The code review component works iteratively: Claude analyzes a changed file, then may request related files (imports, base classes, tests) via tool calling to understand context before providing final feedback. You're evaluating batch processing to reduce API costs. What is the primary technical constraint when considering batch processing for this workflow?